Print This Post Print This Post

UK media is reporting that Britain is planing unspecified curbs on what are described as “Muslim Brotherhood-linked organisations” and blocking any Brotherhood “activists” from relocating to the UK. According to the report in the Daily Telegraph, the actions stem from the recent investigation initiated by UK Prime Minister David Cameron:

United Kingdom

United Kingdom

September 14, 2014 Britain is set to impose curbs on Muslim Brotherhood-linked organisations and block activists moving to London after a report by a senior diplomat raised concerns over the group’s links to extremists in the Middle East. David Cameron asked Sir John Jenkins, the ambassador to Saudi Arabia, to compile a full report on the Muslim Brotherhood after Gulf allies put pressure on the government to curtail the movement’s London-based operations.

 Officials privy to the drafting of Sir John’s report said it had been handed over to Downing Street and a statement on its findings would be published before the end of the year.

While it stops short of proposing a ban on the Brotherhood, it accepts some of the movement’s activity amounts to complicity with armed groups and extremists in the Middle East and elsewhere.

‘We won’t ban the Muslim Brotherhood,’ a Foreign Office diplomat told The Telegraph. ‘There are other things that can be done but not a ban.’

A senior British official involved in the process said parts of the report are too sensitive to publish. ‘It’s a very comprehensive look at the activities of the Muslim Brotherhood in many countries. There have been submissions that have been given to us that are very sensitive. We couldn’t go back to those places again if some of this information was put in the public domain.’

Read the entire report here.

The GMBDW initially reported on the UK investigation in April. Since that time we reported in August that the investigation has concluded that the Muslim Brotherhood “does not pose a significant terror threat in the UK” as well as reporting that a leader of the “International Organization of the Muslim Brotherhood” has said that he expects the UK government not to given to what he describes as pressure to label the Brotherhood a terrorist organization.

We continue to await the actual public report on the investigation before drawing any solid ocnclusions.

Categories : Editor's Notice
Comments Comments Off
Print This Post Print This Post

A UK-based Saudi newspaper  is reporting that according to head of the Muslim Brotherhood’s “International Organization”, many of the Muslim Brotherhood leaders reported to be leaving Qatar will likely be traveling to Turkey or Malaysia. According to the Asharq Al-Awsat report:

September 15 London, Dammam and Cairo, Asharq Al-Awsat—Many of the Muslim Brotherhood members expelled from Qatar on Saturday will likely travel to Turkey or Malaysia, the head of the organization’s international wing has told Asharq Al-Awsat. Speaking via telephone from Morocco, Ibrahim Mounir, the secretary-general of the International Muslim Brotherhood Organization, said he expected most of the members asked to leave Qatar by the government to head to Malaysia or Turkey since many of them had already obtained visas or residency permits to either of these countries, ‘which will make their living or residing there an easy matter.’

This comes as the Muslim Brotherhood said on Saturday that seven of its members currently residing in Qatar had been asked to leave the country by the authorities.

There has as yet been no official confirmation from Doha regarding the decision, but Brotherhood sources speaking to Asharq Al-Awsat said there had been ‘outside pressure’ on Qatar to make the move, one seen as an attempt to appease regional neighbors such as Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, the UAE and Egypt, who have been angered by Doha’s willingness to host senior members of the Brotherhood.

Egypt said it now expects more Brotherhood figures to be expelled from Qatar, which became a prime destination for many of the group’s members fleeing Egypt following Mursi’s ouster.

Read the rest here.

The GMBDW reported yesterday on the announcement by the Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood that a number of its leaders had been asked by Qatar to leave the country. However, Bloomberg News is reporting that according an anonymous Qatari diplomat, these individuals are leaving Qatar of their own accord and denied they were being expelled as has been widely reported.

Although it has been widely reported that London was the destination for the Brotherhood officials, it would seem unlikely given the greatly increased spotlight focused on the Muslim Brotherhood in the UK resulting from the investigation initiated by UK Prime Minister David Cameron. The GMBDW has long been reporting on Turkey as a new center for the Global Muslim Brotherhood and the importance of Malaysian politician Anwar Ibrahim makes Malaysia a logical choice as well.

 

Categories : Daily
Comments Comments Off
Print This Post Print This Post

Turkish news portal is reporting on Twitter comments by Global Muslim Brotherhood leader Youssef Qaradawi in which is says that he does not accept the US effort to fight the group known as ISIS. According to the report:

Youssef Qaradawi

Youssef Qaradawi

September 14, 2014 World Bulletin/News Desk The chairman of the International Union of Muslim Scholars has spoken out against the U.S.-led coalition of nearly 40 countries against the ISIL. Academic Yusuf al-Qaradawi commented: ‘I have completely different ideas and methods from IS. On the other hand, I do not accept the United States action to fight against them because the US follows its own interests, not Islamic values.’ The comments were written in Arabic on Sunday on al-Qaradawi’s Twitter account.  A group of nations, including 10 Arab states, have agreed to form a coalition to tackle IS in Iraq and Syria.

For a profile of Youssef Qaradawi, go here.

For a profile of the International Union of Muslim Scholars (IUMS), go here.

Categories : Daily
Comments Comments Off
Print This Post Print This Post

Global media is widely reporting on the announcement by the Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood that a number of its leaders have been asked by Qatar to leave the country. According to a New York Times report:

Qatar Flag

Qatar Flag

September 13, 2014 BAGHDAD — An Egyptian leader of the Muslim Brotherhood said Saturday that several of the group’s prominent members had been asked to leave Qatar, in an apparent concession to a campaign by other Persian Gulf monarchies to pressure Qatar away from its support for the group.

“Some symbols of the Muslim Brotherhood and its political wing — the Freedom and Justice Party — who were asked by authorities to move their residence outside the state of Qatar have now honored that request,” the Egyptian, Amr Darrag, a senior Brotherhood leader, said in a statement posted on the group’s website.

A Qatari diplomat contradicted Mr. Darrag, speaking on the condition of anonymity. The diplomat said that the Brotherhood leaders had decided to depart for their own reasons without any request from Qatar, and that they were welcome to return.

“Maybe for some of them, they saw from the media that the country is being pressed and they left of their own free will because they did not want to put the country in an embarrassing situation,” the diplomat said.

Read the rest here.

Various sources are also reporting that Egypt has asked INTERPOL to arrest Muslim Brotherhood figures leaving Qatar.

According to a report in the Middle East Monitor, itself close to the Global Muslim Brotherhood, among the individuals to be leaving include the notorious anti-Semitic cleric Wagdi Ghoneim:

The source, who spoke on condition of anonymity, said that the people to be expelled are: the Secretary General of the Brotherhood, Mahmoud Hussein, member of Freedom and Justice party Amro Darraj, Hamza Zoba, Ashraf Badriddin, Jamal Abdul-Sattar and the renowned preachers Isam Talima and Wajdi Ghoneem.

The GMBDW had reported in September 2013 that Ghoneim was among fourteen defendants charged by Egyptian authorities in connection with clashes that took place last December in front of Al-Itihidaya presidential palace in Cairo. In April, we reported that he had met in Khartoum with Sudanese Muslim Brotherhood figure Hassan al-Turabi. For a full profile of Wagdi Ghoneim, go here.

Despite the interpretation in the major media that the seeming expulsion of the Muslim Brotherhood leaders is a watershed event that may satisfy Qatar’s neighbors, the GMBDW has serious doubts. Qatar is a major sponsor of the Global Muslim Brotherhood networks though its official and quasi-official organizations such as Qatar Charity, the Qatar Faculty of Islamic Studies, and the Qatar Foundation. Global Muslim Brotherhood leader Youssef Qaradawi and Hamas political leader Khaled Meshaal are also hosted and resident in Qatar which itself is a major funder of Hamas. The GMBDW reported in late August that the Humanitarian Relief Foundation (IHH), a Turkish group close to the Global Muslim Brotherhood, has signed a ‘strategic cooperation agreement’ with Qatar. Earlier this month, we reported that Qatar Charity had sponsored a conference in Istanbul at which GMB leaders announced a $1 billion fundraising campaign for Gaza and the launch of a new organization appearing to unify Hamas fundraising and flotilla efforts. The relocation of a group of Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood leaders and clerics, while clearly a token gesture, does nothing at all to dismantle the significant and growing infrastructure located in Qatar propping up the Global Muslim Brotherhood.

Categories : Daily
Comments Comments Off
Print This Post Print This Post

Irish media has reported that Dr Ali Selim, associated with the  Islamic Cultural Centre in Ireland, has called for what are described as radical changes in the Irish educational system to accommodate children with Islamic beliefs. According to the Irish Times report:

Ali Selim

Ali Selim

September 3, 2014 A spokesman for the Muslim community in Ireland has called for radical change in the educational system to accommodate children with Islamic beliefs.

Dr Ali Selim, of the Islamic Cultural Centre in Dublin’s Clonskeagh and a lecturer in the Mater Dei Institute and Trinity College, has called for ‘a revolution of inclusivity’ in Irish schools and ‘an upheaval in Irish educational perspectives’.

This was necessary to accommodate the needs of a society which is now ‘home to a variety of Christian denominations, as well as people of other faiths and of none’, he says in his book Islam and Education in Ireland, to be published next week.

Why do schools insist we kit out our children like miniature adults from the 1950s? Some foreign language schools were ‘visa factories’ Tighter regime for issuing of student visas announced Estimating that of approximately 65,000 Muslims in Ireland today as many as 20,000 would be in the under-18 school-going age, he relates difficulties these young people face when it comes to admission to schools, as well as their problems with PE classes, relationship and sexuality education, music and drama classes, and practice of their faith during school hours.

Read the rest here.

 In September 2012, the GMBDW reported that  Dr. Selim, had made comments praising the concept of “martyrdom.”

In February 2010, we reported on Dr. Selim in connection with statements by Irish Muslim Brotherhood leaders saying that a ban on face veils violates personal freedoms.

Ali Selim is the private secretary to Hussein Halawa, the imam of the Islamic Cultural Centre of Ireland, closely tied to the European Muslim Brotherhood, and is described as am ICCI “resident theologian.” Mr. Selim attracted a great deal of local media attention in September 2006 when he told a newspaper interviewer that, ideally, he would like to see Shariah law adopted in Ireland in the “event of a Muslim majority.” Along the same lines, Mr. Selim said in 2006 that religious law should be imposed over secular law if that was wished by the majority. Other controversial statements by Mr. Selim include:

  • Suggesting that there were conspiratorial forces behind the 911 attacks saying “history, definitely, will prove to us that those people were not the only ones involved in 9/11. That, in actual fact, there’s a wider circle that’s under the shade so we can’t see it at the moment. “
  • Saying he had seen no proof that Muslims carried out the July 2006 London bombings, suggesting that videotapes of the bombers might have been faked and that he was not aware that they were identified by their own families.
  • Claiming he was unaware of any Muslims calling for Jihad against the West
  • Saying that he had “no opinion” about Osama Bin Laden
Categories : Daily
Comments Comments Off
Print This Post Print This Post

Israeli media is reporting a seemingly dramatic development in the relationship between Hamas and Israel, quoting a senior Hamas official who says that that Islam does prohibit negotiations with Israel. According to the Times of Israel report:

Mousa Abu Marzook

Mousa Abu Marzook

September 11, 2014 In a dramatic political about-face, a senior Hamas official said that his movement may seek to negotiate with Israel, claiming that Islamic faith does not prohibit such contacts.

Moussa Abu Marzouk, deputy head of Hamas’s political bureau, told Palestinian Al-Quds TV on Wednesday that Hamas may be forced to negotiate with Israel, since the vast majority of Gaza Strip residents demand it.

‘From the point of view of Sharia (Islamic law), nothing prevents negotiations with the occupation. Just as you negotiate with it using weapons, you can negotiate using words,’ Abu Marzouk said. ‘I believe that if things continue as they are now, Hamas may not have a choice. I say this in all honesty, [negotiations] have become a quasi-popular demand at the moment among all people in the Gaza Strip. Hamas may find itself forced to adopt this policy.’

Abu Marzouk noticeably struggled to articulate his movement’s new position, a reversal of earlier stances which forbade direct contact with Jerusalem.

Read the rest here

In April 2012, the GMBDW reported on comments by Mr Marzouk in which he outlined his view of how Hamas will view any potential agreement with Israel:

…an agreement between Israel and the P.A. — even one ratified by a referendum of all Palestinians — as a hudna, or cease-fire, rather than as a peace treaty. In power, he said, Hamas would feel free to shift away from those provisions of the agreement that define it as a peace treaty and move instead toward a relationship of armed truce. ‘We will not recognize Israel as a state,’ he said emphatically. ‘It will be like the relationship between Lebanon and Israel or Syria and Israel

Only time will tell if Mr. Marzouk’s current statements reflect an actual change in Hamas policy or whether they are in fact some kind of trial balloon.

Of historical interest is a 2007 court filing by US federal prosecutors that detailed the role of Mousa Abu Marzook as a former leader of the US Muslim Brotherhood and the US Palestine Committee. According to the document:

By the outbreak of the First Intifada, the Muslim Brotherhood in the United States was significant and well organized. In 1987, the governing body of the International Muslim Brotherhood decided to focus its mission on the Palestinian issue, and directed that Palestine Committees be formed in countries throughout the world. In the United States, the Palestine Committee was comprised of active Muslim Brotherhood members of Palestinian origin. The leader of the Palestinian Committee in the United States at that time was unindicted co-conspirator Mousa Abu Marzook. Marzook is now – and has been since 1995 – a Specially Designated Terrorist and Hamas leader. In fact, in the early 1990s, Marzook left his post as a leader of the United States-based Muslim Brotherhood and Palestinian Committee to take over as Hamas’ Political Bureau Chief, the organization’s highest official position.

The creation and growth of the Palestine Committee in the United States are evidenced in part by documents that the government seized in 2004 from the Virginia home of unindicted co-conspirator and Palestinian Committee member Ismail Elbarasse. As shown by those documents and other evidence, the Muslim Brotherhood directed its Palestinian Committees throughout the world, including the United States, to carry out the mandate of assisting Sheik Yassin and his newly-formed Hamas Movement. In accordance with that mandate, the Palestinian Committee in the United States, which included the defendants Elashi, Baker and El-Mezain, oversaw a number of sub- organizations charged with varying missions calculated to comprehensively address Hamas’ needs. These organizations included the United Association for Studies and Research (UASR) (“think tank”), the Islamic Association of Palestine (IAP) (propaganda and information) and the Occupied Land Fund (OLF) (money), later to become the defendant HLF. The defendant Shukri Abu Baker was in charge of the HLF and, along with the defendants El-Mezain and Elashi, set out to establish what would become the highest grossing Islamic charity in the United States.

It should be noted that the Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR) grew directly out of the IAP and Hamas infrastructure in the US.

This court document should serve as at least partial rebuttal to skeptics of the concept of a Global Muslim Brotherhood.

Categories : Breaking News
Comments Comments Off
Print This Post Print This Post

Egyptian media has reported that a Cairo court has sentenced the notorious Egyptian cleric Safwat Hegazy to 20 years in jail on charges of torture and leading a terrorist group. According to the Daily News Egypt report, Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood political leader Mohamed Al-Beltagy also received the same sentence:

Safwat Hegazy

Safwat Hegazy

The Cairo Criminal Court sentenced former Freedom and Justice Party leader Mohamed Al-Beltagy and Islamist preacher Safwat Hegazy to 20 years in jail charged with torture and leading a terrorist group.

Al-Beltagy and Hegazy, along with two others, were given ten years on charges of kidnapping and torturing two policemen at the Rabaa Al-Adaweya sit-in in August 2013. The pair received an additional ten years for ‘being in command of a terrorist group’, while the other two, who were doctors at the sit-in’s field hospital, received five years for joining a terrorist group.

Al-Beltagy, who was Secretary General of the Muslim Brotherhood’s political wing, the Freedom and Justice Party (FJP), dissolved in August, was arrested in a rural village in Giza. Hegazy, a controversial preacher closely associated with the Brotherhood, was arrested on the Siwa-Matruh road, close to the Libyan border in August. The former is also being tried alongside former president Mohamed Morsi and other Muslim Brotherhood leaders for inciting violence outside the Presidential Palace on 5 December 2012. The alleged violence resulted in at least eleven deaths and 693 injuries.

Read the rest here.

Safwat Hegazy first drew substantial media attention in May 2012 when he was featured at a launch ceremony for the presidential campaign of Mohamed Morsi where he declared “The capital of the Caliphate – the capital of the United States of the Arabs – will be Jerusalem, Allah willing.” Hegazy is known to have been a Trustee of the International Union of Muslim Scholars (IUMS) headed by Global Muslim Brotherhood leader Youssef Qaradawi. Hegazy is also known for his fantastical anti-Semitic claims such as in January 2009 when he delivered a long tirade on Egyptian TV proclaiming that the Starbucks Logo (actually a fictional nautical creature) was “the Queen of the Jews”:

In May, the GMBDW reported that Hegazy has been sentenced to a year in prison “with labor” for insulting judges during a recent trial. In February, we reported that Hegazy was one of fourteen Muslim Brotherhood leaders referred to criminal court on accusations of burning an Egyptian national security building.

For a full profile of Safwat Hegazy, go here.

Categories : Daily
Comments Comments Off
Print This Post Print This Post

An Arabian business publication has reported that Muslim Brotherhood support John Esposito is one of six directors of Middle East Studies at US universities who have signed a public letter pledging ‘not to collaborate on projects and events involving Israeli academic institutions’. According to the Arabian Business report:

John Esposito

John Esposito

Six directors of Middle East Studies at US universities have signed a public letter pledging ‘not to collaborate on projects and events involving Israeli academic institutions’.

Their stance could potentially affect future public funding, because as heads of US Department of Education Title VI National Resource Centers, they are required by the Higher Education Opportunity Act to give assurances that they will ‘maintain linkages with overseas institutions of higher education and other organisations that may contribute to the teaching and research of the Center’.

If their protests are not personal, and apply to the centres where they are directors, it would be in conflict with the assurances they gave in exchange for federal funds.

The six directors are: Lila Abu-Lughod, Middle East Institute, Columbia; Marian Cooke, Middle East Studies Center, Duke; Osama Abi-Mershed, Center for Contemporary Arab Studies, Georgetown; John Esposito, Prince Alwaleed bin-Talal Center for Muslim-Christian Understanding, Georgetown; Helga Tawil-Souri, Hagop Kevorkian Center for Near Eastern Studies, New York University and Gabriel Piterberg, Center for Near Eastern Studies, University of California, Los Angeles. The six are part of a group of over 500 Middle East Studies scholars and librarians who have called for the boycott of Israeli academic institutions.

The GMBDW reported in June that Dr. Esposito had testified before the UK House of Commons in a hearing about allegations of MB’s links to terrorism.

Dr. John Esposito is a professor of International Affairs and Islamic Studies at Georgetown University. He is also the director of the Saudi-funded Prince Alwaleed Bin Talal Center for Muslim-Christian Understanding at Georgetown University. Esposito, a former U.S. State Department advisor,  has espoused views consistent with Brotherhood doctrine and during the 1990’s was known for his claims that Islamic fundamentalism was, in fact, democratic and posed no threat to the U.S. Dr. Esposito has at least a dozen past or present affiliations with global Muslim Brotherhood/Hamas organizations including having served on the advisory board of the Institute of Islamic Political Thought in the UK headed by Azzam Tamimi, a leader in the U.K. Muslim Brotherhood and often described as a Hamas spokesman. Dr. Esposito has also served with global Muslim Brotherhood leader Youssef Qaradawi on the Steering Committee of the Circle of Tradition and Progress and enjoyed a close relationship with the United Association For Studies and Research (USAR), part of the U.S. Muslim Brotherhood’s Palestine Committee and part of the Hamas support infrastructure. In 2005, Saudi prince Alaweed bin Talal, a financial supporter of the global Muslim Brotherhood, donated $20 million to the Center for Muslim Christian Understanding at Georgetown, headed by Dr. Esposito.

Categories : Daily
Comments Comments Off
Print This Post Print This Post

The Libyan Herald has published an article titled “Ambassador To Turkey Remains In Place But Relations With Ankara Take Another Knock” which looks at some of the controversy in Libyan over what is perceived as Turkish support for the Libyan Muslim Brotherhood. According to the article, reposted on an individual’s Facebook page:

Libyan Flag

Libyan Flag

Tripoli, 4 September 2014: The Libyan Ambassador in Cairo, Abdul-Aziz Jibril, has denied saying that the Libyan Ambassador to Turkey has been recalled.

He told the Libya Herald that reports quoting him as saying that Ambassador Abdulrazak Abdulqader had been recalled from Ankara because of a row between the House of Representatives and Turkey were false. He added that he was frustrated with the media for making the claims. Abdulqader was still in Turkey, he said.

Meanwhile, however, businessmen in Tobruk have said they will boycott Turkish goods over the spat.

The hostilities were prompted by comments from Turkish President Recep Erdogan on Al-Jazeera TV. He reportedly said that Turkey could not accept the Libyan legislature’s meeting in Tobruk, a statement that has been made in the past by Libya Dawn, the coalition of Misratan-led armed groups currently controlling Tripoli.

On Monday the Ministry of Foreign Affairs said it was ‘surprised’ by what it had perceived as the ‘blatant interference in Libyan internal affairs’. It called on Erdogan to clarify his statements noting that he had congratulated the newly-elected House of Representatives after it held its first session in Tobruk in August.

The Turkish government is widely viewed in Libya as supporting the Libyan Muslim Brotherhood since the revolution, alongside Qatar. Libyan Muslim Brotherhood figures are known to visit Turkey regularly for meetings and use it as a safe haven.

The significance of Libya within the context of the region’s ideological fault-lines came to the fore last month when it emerged that the UAE and Egypt, both bitterly opposed to the brotherhood, had collaborated to bomb positions in Tripoli held by armed groups sympathetic to the Islamist movement.

The Tobruk-based Operation Dignity, which has offered protection to the House of Representatives, has been seen to have the backing of both Egypt and the UAE.

Last week Emirati authorities rounded up at least 30 Libyan nationals believed to have ties to the Muslim Brotherhood and Libya Dawn.

The GMBDW reported in June that unknown gunmen had kidnapped a leading member of a Libyan political party described as affiliated with the Muslim Brotherhood. We also reported in June that Libyan militias tied to the Muslim Brotherhood had stormed the offices of the country’s prime minister. In May, the GMBDW recommended a new report on the current situation facing the Muslim Brotherhood in Libya which concluded that the Brotherhood organization does not have high levels of public support.

 Other GMBDW coverage of events in Libya has included:

  • The GMBDW reported in January 2014 that the Libyan Muslim Brotherhood has withdrawn its five ministers from the government of Prime Minister Ali Zeidan.
  • The GMBDW reported in July 2013 that protestors had attacked the offices of the Libyan Muslim Brotherhood yesterday following demonstrations over the assassination of a prominent critic of the Brotherhood. 
  • In June 2013, Libyan lawmakers elected a Parliament chief strongly supported by the Muslim Brotherhood’s political arm, the Justice and Construction Party.
  • In July 2012, the Libyan Brotherhood suffered what appeared to be a major loss when they finished a distant second place in national elections.
  • In 2011, the New York Times reported on what they called  the “growing influence of Islamists in Libya”, identifying Qatari Muslim Brotherhood figure Ali Sallabi (aka Ali Salabi), already known to be the Revolution’s “spiritual leader and a close associate of Global Muslim Brotherhood leader Youssef Qaradawi, as well as for the first time Abel al-Rajazk Abu Hajar who was said to lead the Tripoli Municipal Governing Council and is described as a “Muslim Brotherhood figure.” Our predecessor publication had reported on Ali Sallabi and his association with Qaradawi.

For analysis and background on the Libyan Muslim Brotherhood, go herehere, and here.

Categories : Recommended Reading
Comments Comments Off
Print This Post Print This Post

Hamas leaders have made a number of recent media appearances which offer a revealing insight into their view of the conflict. On August 26, Hamas leader Mahmoud Al-Zahhar urged in a pubic address broadcast on Hamas TV that “the Gaza experience should be repeated in the West Bank” and claimed that Israeli soldiers “vomited and wet their pants” when told they were to enter the Shuja’iyya neighborhood of the Gaza Strip. According to a MEMRI translation:

Hamas

Hamas

August 26, 2014 Clip No. 4456 Mahmoud Al-Zahhar: The Gaza Experience Should Be Repeated in the West Bank and Jerusalem

In an address in Gaza on August 26, Hamas leader Mahmoud Al-Zahhar said that the Gaza experience should be repeated in the West Bank, and said: ‘We are entering a phase of rebuilding the homes, rearming, and developing our capabilities, until we can liberate all of Palestine.’ The address aired on Al-Aqsa TV.

Mahmoud Al-Zahhar: ‘Read what it says in the newspapers about the (Israeli) soldiers who were told that they were to enter Shuja’iyya. They vomited and wet their pants. Dear brothers, the true owners of the land have vanquished the foreign settlers. While the people of Gaza were emerging from the rubble, and sitting on (what was left) of their homes, more than half of occupied Palestine was evacuated. The (Israelis) were saying: We will not return before the Al-Qassam Brigades says so. Today, we have told them to return, because we know we are entering a phase of rebuilding the homes, rearming, and developing our capabilities, until we can liberate all of Palestine…’

Read the rest here.

On August 27, Hamas Prime Minister appeared to accept responsibility for initiating the recent Gaza conflict by telling a rally broadcast on Hamas TV that “The battle began with the shelling of Haifa.” According to a MEMRI translation:

August 27, 2014 Clip No. 4455 Hamas Leader Ismail Haniya: ‘The Battle Began and Ended with the Shelling of Haifa’

In the ‘victory’ celebrations in Gaza on August 27, Hamas PM Ismail Haniya declared: ‘The battle began with the shelling of Haifa and ended with the shelling of Haifa.’ The rally was broadcast on Al-Aqsa TV.

Announcer: ‘The resistance bombards and declares: More surprises are to be expected. We regret to announce that Tel Aviv was bombarded. Shadi Al-Bourini and Qassem Al-Najjar in their song: ‘Strike a blow at Tel Aviv. ‘Strike a blow at Tel Aviv. ‘Strike a blow at Tel Aviv. ‘Make the Zionists tremble with terror. ‘Whatever you build we will destroy. ‘Strike a blow at Tel Aviv…’

[...]

Ismail Haniya: ‘The Battle began with the shelling of Haifa and ended with the shelling of Haifa.’

Read the rest here.

On August 28, Hamas political leader living in exile in Qatar made a public address also broadcast on Hamas TV in which he said that the Israelis had “perpetrated a new holocaust, even worse than the holocaust perpetrated by Hitler.” According to a MEMRI translation:

Following are excerpts from a public address delivered by Hamas leader Khaled Mash’al, which aired on Al-Quds TV on August 28, 2014:

Khaled Mash’al: Our hearts go out to the displaced, to the 460,000 of our people in Gaza against whom the leaders of the enemy perpetrated a new holocaust, even worse than the holocaust perpetrated by Hitler. They destroyed neighborhoods, homes, towers, hospitals, schools, and factories. They targeted all the capabilities of our people, and indeed, they targeted many of them. Now they are displaced, and my heart goes out to you, my brothers and sisters in Gaza.

Read the rest here.

Additionally, Israel media has reported that a senior Hamas leader has suggested that the organization’s recent public executions were undertaken “to satisfy the public.” According to a Ynet News report:

August 24, 2014 Israel News After Hamas’ string of public executions in the Gaza Strip garnered intense criticism, with Palestinian officials and human rights organizations calling them ‘provocative’ and ‘grossly unfair’, senior Hamas leader Moussa Abu Marzouk has offered an unconventional perspective on the matter, saying that the actions were conducted in public in an attempt to satisfy the Palestinian people’s desires.   Follow Ynetnews on Facebook and Twitter   Abu Marzouk’s comments were made in an interview with al-Jazeera on Friday while he was in Qatar, where he met with Khaled Mashal to discuss the next steps after the collapse of ceasefire talks in Cairo.

Abu Marzouk’s interview with al-Jazeera   During the interview, Abu Marzouk was asked whether ‘the information regarding the 18 informers (was) based on real time information, or did you already have the information at hand without conducting the execution, but the decision (to execute) was made today?’

Hamas lining up victims for execution   The Hamas official’s answer was surprising: ‘No, basically there were already sentenced to death, but the execution was done collectively today (Friday).’   ‘It is possible that this step was taken to satisfy the public in this matter, without considering other legal measures that should have been taken,’ Abu Marzouk added.

Read the rest here.

Categories : Daily
Comments Comments Off